I have been intently watching as much of the Democratic National Convention as I can manage, and, for the most part, the proceedings can be boiled down to these three ideas: 1.) The service (read imprisonment, torture) of John McCain is all well and good BUT he is weak on the economy 2.) John McCain and Bush the younger are one in the same, and finally, 3.) The Republicans are the party of the few for the few, while the Democrats hold exclusive license as far as caring for the masses is concerned, (the irony of millionaires accusing other millionaires of being out of touch with people like you and me need not be further explored).
Today, the DNC has been giving Obama credit for his year-long pledge to withdraw "combat" troops from Iraq within the first 16 months of his presidency. A year ago Obama stated far and wide that the upcoming surge was a mistake, and that we needed to get out of Iraq, and the quicker, the better. Now, the Democrats have the astounding gall to claim that Obama was ahead of the curve on current events, even as the Dems are attempting to take credit for the results of a troop increase that they roundly and publicly criticized.
All of this brings us to the question that is the title of this blog. At this moment in time, Obama, just like a broken clock, has found himself in the condition of being "correct", in spite of himself.